FiveM Framework Migration
Migrating frameworks is not a data conversion problem. The database is the easy part. The hard part is that every custom and paid resource on your server calls the old framework’s API, and those calls have to be rewritten or replaced.
Budget by resource count, not by database size. A server with 40 custom resources is a months-long project regardless of which two frameworks are involved.
Before you start
The escrow point catches people out. Any resource protected by asset escrow cannot be edited, so a framework change means buying the vendor’s other build or dropping the script entirely.
Documented migration paths
QBCore to Qbox
The best-documented path, because Qbox is a QBCore fork and the Qbox team maintains a conversion guide.
Key changes you will hit:
- Job and gang grades become numbers, not strings, in
qbx_core/shared/jobs.luaandshared/gangs.lua - Multi-job and multi-gang are built into
qbx_coreand write to a newplayer_groupstable — external multijob resources will corrupt data players.citizenidmust use theutf8mb4_unicode_cicollation- The inventory becomes
ox_inventory, which needs its own database conversion
Run convertjobs in the txAdmin console after importing qbx_core.sql to
populate player_groups.
ESX to QBCore
Both frameworks model a character, money accounts and a job grade, so the data
maps cleanly. The API surface does not: xPlayer.addAccountMoney('money', n)
becomes Player.Functions.AddMoney('cash', n), esx:playerLoaded becomes
QBCore:Server:PlayerLoaded, and the identifier column changes meaning.
For a manual conversion checklist, see RPScripts’ guide to converting ESX, QBCore and Qbox scripts (same team as FiveM Docs). This is not an automatic converter; review every handler, database mapping, and permission boundary.
ESX to QBCore migration guide → · Breaking-change checklist → · Updating customised resources →
QBCore to ESX
No maintained guide exists in this direction, and it is rare in practice — the script market flows the other way. Treat it as a rewrite rather than a migration, and read the ESX xPlayer overview before estimating.
Anything to ox_core or ND Core
There is no migration path, official or community, and this is by design.
ox_core uses a different persistence model — users and characters are separate
entities, groups replace jobs, and accounts are first-class objects with
invoices and permissions. Your player data can be transformed; your resources
cannot be converted.
If you want ox_core, plan a new server build and migrate players, not code.
Off vRP
vRP predates the modern ecosystem and shares almost no vocabulary with it. See Legacy frameworks for what a realistic exit looks like.
Rollback plan
Decide these before the maintenance window opens, not during it:
- Trigger — what observation makes you roll back (boot failure, data loss, more than N broken resources)
- Deadline — the clock time after which you stop debugging and revert
- Procedure — restore the database dump, restore the previous
resourcesfolder, restore the previousserver.cfg - Communication — how players are told the server is reverting
Keep the old server artifacts and resources folder on disk until the new
framework has survived a full week of normal load.
Related pages
- Choosing a framework — avoid migrating twice
- Backups — the dump you will need
- txAdmin recipes — how the target framework installs